The 2005 discovery of yet more ancient Stone Age tools in Cuxton finally makes the local newspaper... |
“When visiting Canon Colson on 24th August, 1889, on
entering the gate of the rectory garden I picked up a fine Palaeolithic flint
celt which lay upon the bank.” So
stated noted Sittingbourne antiquarian (and founder of
Later, in 1902, Mr. Payne noted that four other flint hand-axes from this same
locality had been unearthed, one of which had been found by workmen laying a
water main in the carriage drive of the rectory a few feet from the entrance
gate.
Things remained this way until the autumn of 1962, when Bexley-based archaeologist
Peter Tester was invited (by the Lower Medway Archaeological Research Group) to
supervise the excavation of what were thought to be the remains of a Roman
building, which had been found just inside the rectory gate close to where the
flint tools were discovered.
No Roman material was forthcoming and it was quickly found that the “chalk wall”
of the supposed building was nothing more than an exposure of natural chalk
deposits.
Drawings of Acheulian tools found by P.J. Tester at Cuxton rectory in 1962 |
However, Mr. Tester’s initial excavation also uncovered a thin bed of gravel containing 14 fine flint hand-axes and a number of associated flint flakes. Subsequent excavations discovered over 600 Palaeolithic flint artefacts of a type identified as “Acheulian” (1).
It became clear that the area around the Cuxton rectory site was once used by some of our earliest human ancestors, dating from around the same time as the nearby remains and artefacts associated with “Swanscombe Man” that were found at Barnfield Pit in 1935, and which have recently been shown to be approximately 300,000 years old.
The recovered skull of "Swanscombe Man", (or Woman, as it transpired...) |
Monument at Swanscombe Heritage Park commemorating the discovery of Swanscombe Man... |
Further excavations made opposite the Rectory in 1984 at
Acheulian flint hand axe (top) and scraper (above) discovered in Cuxton, 2005. Scale is in cm. |
This area of what we now call Cuxton was very different 300,000 years ago, as might be expected! The passage of the late Palaeolithic was a time between two of the periodic ice ages of the Pleistocene era, known as the “Purfleet Interglacial”. Although the geology of the
In terms of climate, the summers of interglacial Cuxton then were slightly warmer than today (about 3°C) and the winters slightly cooler. The hominids that lived in the
300,000 years ago, Cuxton's inhabitants would have lived around - and even hunted - creatures such as the extinct Straight-Tusked elephant (pictured right)... |
The fossil record in
Fossils of early hominids are scarce. Unfortunately, as former Rector of Cuxton Revd. R.A. Smith (in his 1964 booklet "The Church and Village of Cuxton") recounts:
Fossilised skull of Homo Heidelburgensis (left) and reconstruction... |
Homo Heidelburgensis, if you met them, would be unlikely to consider you as
their grandchild 10,000 times removed, however. Instead, they would probably
consider you to be lunch.
It is thought that they were powerfully built, much stronger than modern
humans, and certainly hunted animals to eat. There is evidence to suggest that
they used fire and made shelters, that they looked after their old and weak,
and may have had a rudimentary language.
At Cuxton, our distant ancestors were attracted to the flints that were washed
out of the coastline by the action of the river. It seems they lived and made
their tools where the latter were discovered.
Many of the flint artefacts found were quite large. If we consider that
Cuxton’s “Heidelburgers” were most likely hunter-gatherers, it seems feasible
that stashes of the larger tools would be left in favoured parts of their
territory, places from which they could easily be retrieved to process nearby
“kills”.
This seems to be borne out by the recent
discovery of a cache of over 800 similar flint tools on nearby Frindsbury
Hill, which were discovered in early 2023 during the construction of the new
Archaeologist Dr. Letty Ingrey with some of the Acheulian tools found at nearby Frindsbury... |
It is difficult to imagine that such numbers of similar flint tools, so close to the Cuxton site and of about the same age, were not made by the same hunter-gatherer community.
It is has been suggested that the large tools were more symbolic than practical. However, in times when day-to-day survival must have a difficult and unrelenting struggle, manufacture of such objects would have represented a significant investment of time and effort. I therefore find it difficult to believe they were merely symbolic. Cuxton’s “Heidelburgers” were powerfully built and very strong and, unlike us, they would not have struggled to handle them. Whilst some of their flint tools seem, to us, extremely large and heavy, in strong hands they would have been ideally suited to rendering down large animal carcasses, cutting wood or treating large animal skins. They were perhaps simply the “power tools” of their era.
And why were so many made and then seemingly abandoned? I think it is possible that the caches of flint tools were just the equivalent of modern day tool stores, and that the sheer numbers of tools found simply represent the accumulated output of a small community that occupied their territory for a very long time, possibly for hundreds of generations. Or maybe they just liked making them.
We can only guess. What we do know is that another period of glaciation cycles (the “Devensian”) begun around 110,000 years ago, driving out the sparse population of hominids from the
The maximum extent of the ice sheet of the most recent ("Devensian") Ice age... |
Although even at its maximum extent (around 20,000 years ago), the Devensian ice sheet did not reach down as far as the south of England, the climate would have be brutally cold here until the end of the Pleistocene and the final retreat of the glaciers just 15,000 years ago.
It is thought that hominids in the shape of our direct ancestors, Homo Sapiens, returned permanently to the British Isles around 9000 years ago, although small numbers of both Homo Sapiens and Neanderthals were known to have temporarily inhabited parts of
After the last ice age,
How "Doggerland" gradually vanished under the North Sea after the last Ice Age... |
By then, Mesolithic humans were well-established in the Cuxton area, as evidenced by the discovery of large numbers of flint spear heads, arrow-heads, hand-axes and other flint relics in the Ranscombe area by local Cuxton antiquarian Dave May.
Mesolithic flint tools found at Ranscombe... |
These tools are smaller and seem (to us) far more practical in nature than the larger Acheulian ones of Palaeolithic times. The site was clearly a place that was long-inhabited - over 15,000 flint artefacts have been found, including innumerable flint flakes that demonstrate that the flint tools were made where they were found.
We know that at least some parts of the Cuxton area were heavily forested at this time (probably with yew, ash, elm, birch, lime and oak) and that the
Aerial view of the Medway M2 Bridge area: the dark spots on the river bank are old tree stumps... |
Ancient tree stump on the Cuxton banks of the Medway... |
However, it is possible that, given the sandy nature of the soil in the north-eastern area of the Ranscombe reserve where the Mesolithic camp site existed, the tree cover was far less extensive. An open area here would have commanded excellent views along the Medway valley and would have been of great strategic value when it came to defending territory against rival tribes.
Cuxton’s Mesolithic residents were also probably hunter-gathers, but in time, it seems possible that the “megafauna” (elk, deer, wild cattle, etc.) numbers began to fall through hunting as they could not be replenished from mainland
Whatever the cause, it was at this time that a large of amount of deforestation took place across the south of
Evidence of a Bronze age settlement at nearby Cobham has been found, represented by pits, post holes and ditches, recorded during excavation work in association with the Channel Tunnel Rail Link in 1998.
In Cuxton, one of the oldest “field names” is Barrow (or Borrow) Hill at Upper Bush and indeed, aerial photography has revealed what looks like a burial barrow, possibly of late Neolithic or early Bronze Age origin (around 2000BC). This may have been linked to the nearby Cobham community.
Excavation work in 2021 undertaken as part of the Vineyard Farms winery application (and conducted by contractors commissioned by the applicants) uncovered skeletal remains of at least one individual, along with around 50 struck flints and associated flakes as well as some shards of decorated pottery consistent with the late Neolithic or early Bronze Age period (5, 6).
An archaeologist uncovers Bronze Age human remains on Barrow Hill at Upper Bush (a skull, at centre)... |
These finds were dismissed as insignificant and not sufficient to warrant protection of the site from the winery construction.
Unfortunately, it seems as if any further excavation work in the area will only be as a result of the construction of the Vineyard Farms winery complex. The “mitigation strategy” proposed by the developer land-owners MDCV UK Ltd (and as agreed with Medway Council) will be to take photographs of any remains found before the concrete starts pouring.
2) R. J. Cruze, 1984, Further Investigation of the Acheulian Site at Cuxton.
3) Francis Wenban-Smith, 2006, Giant Acheulian handaxes.
5) Phase 1 Archaeological evaluation report, Canterbury
Archaeological Trust Ltd, July 2021 (Medway Council Planning Portal ref: 5812490)
6) Archaeological Desk-based
Assessment, Canterbury Archaeological Trust Ltd, July 2021 (Medway Council
Planning Portal ref: 5812491)
No comments:
Post a Comment